The movie is not "too partial", "boring" and I did not have the desire to leave the cinema after 30 minutes.
I believe there are two problems with "Miral". The first is that from the beginning almost everyone (the media etc.) thought that Freida Pinto was the wrong person to play Miral. People were prejudiced. I think she was okay. I don't know about her accent. For my German ears it didn't matter if her accent sounded more "Indian" than "Palestinian" (if it did at all).
The second problem is that everyone thought the movie was going to be great because of Julian Schnabel and the plot etc. People had very, very high expectations. Well, I'm not sure if it is an Oscar candidate but it has some really good parts and some really good actors in it.
Just one general thing: Most of the film is in english. English with various accents. I never understood why people should talk in a foreign language when talking amongst themselves. (It was the same in KOH.) They should either talk in their mother tongue with subtitles or talk english without accents (to imply they really are talking in their mother tongue but for the audience it's english).
I'm going to put some spoiler tags around the next bit, just in case.
It's the story of four women and the history of Israel. It starts with the very end of the story and then there is a flashback to the beginning and Hind Husseini and the foundation of the orphanage. Then the story "jumps" (and it "jumps" quite often which sometimes, I felt, disturbes the "flow" of the story). We are now (20 years later) with Nadia, Mirals mother who is abused by the people she lives with. (I couldn't figure out who exactly they were. They seemed to young to be her parents.) She flees, gets herself in prison and meets Fatima (women no. 3), a former nurse who became a sort of terrorist because of the things that happened to her during the 6-days-war.
Out of the prison we see Nadia marry Jamal (Sid). Sid has actually quite much screentime. I think his character is too good to be true. Are there such men out there somewhere? (No criticism, just an observation.
Several years later Miral is born and already at school age. Nadia is still troubled by her past and eventually commits suicide. Jamal is bringing Miral to Hind for better education.
And now it's Mirals story, now played by Pinto. Btw, I think the child actress playing child-Miral was really good. We now learn about the PLO and how Miral became involved.
The movie ends 1993 with the Oslo-Contracts.
It starts really well and then there is a part in the middle where it is kind of "stuck" (for want of a better word). I can't even tell you why. Maybe that's just a feeling I had. Maybe it's because we get told the stories of the first three women in quite a short time and then we stay with Miral for the rest of the movie. You know, I feel there is a kind of break in the middle of it. It gets really good towards the end including some beautiful shots of the raw countryside.
The camera movements evryone is talking of.... Well sometimes it made me dizzy. Those fast spinning, blurry movements are perfect for some scenes but for others it just felt totally out of place.
In general there is a big "Did you get the message? hanging over the film. I mean, "peace" and "we can all get along" are not bad messages at all but it's coming at you with a bulldozer. It looks like the film wants to be more than it is while a quieter tune would have been much more effective in my opinion.
Concerning the Palestinian-Jew thing: it's not as unbalanced as I thought it would be and as a lot of the press reviews imply. It can't be totally unbiased because it's from the certain point of view of an Palestinian orphanage - so it's okay.
We do see bad, bad Israeli soldiers but we also witness terrorist attacks by the other side. We see the developement of fanatism on both sides which is interesting. True, Fatimas story is kind of difficult. She placed a bomb in a cinema that was supposed to be killing lots of young Israelis. Later we hear: "The bomb didn't go off but I still got twice a life-long term in prison. A third for misbehaving in front of the court." I'm not sure if the film wants us to feel sorry for Fatima and angry with the Israeli judicial system. Yes, she experienced horrible things, still she wanted to kill lots of innnocent people. On the other side we have one of Mirals friends who seems unable to make the tiniest of compromises for the sake of piece.
To explain certain historical events Schnabel uses archive footage. He doesn't tell everything so I think it could be useful to do some backround reading of Israels history if you are not familiar with it.
Overall I liked it.
I haven't read the book, yet. Maybe it will explain more.
You can pre-order it here:
Amazon.co.uk Released on november 11.
Amazon.com Released on november 30.
Amazon.de Released on november 15.
The French version has already been released: Amazon.fr

